Case description
A later catalogue places this event in Beijing at midnight on May 3, 1981. The witness is unnamed, and the available summary does not preserve a contemporary report, interview date or independent observer.
According to the account, the witness was asleep when a push or physical sensation caused him to awaken. Near the bed stood a human-proportioned figure covered in short gray hair and marked by two prominent fang-like teeth.
When the figure moved an arm, the witness reportedly rose into the air and passed outside the house into an object. The source does not preserve a continuous exterior description of the craft, the route from the room or anyone who saw the departure.
The witness then described being taken to a large installation where similar gray-haired figures appeared to work around multiple landed craft. The setting was interpreted as a base, but its location, dimensions and relationship to Beijing were not independently established.
During the return journey, the witness encountered a blonde young adult woman whom he said he had met previously. She asked him questions and permitted him to ask questions in return. The surviving summary does not include the content of that conversation or explain the circumstances of the alleged earlier meeting.
The account ends with the witness returned from the installation. No reliable elapsed time, landing point, medical aftermath, physical trace or contemporaneous witness reaction is preserved in the material examined for this dossier.
URECAT reproduces a summary by Albert Rosales, who cites Gordon Creighton in Flying Saucer Review, volume 28 number 6. That chain is useful for locating the published version but does not identify the original reporter, translator or field investigator.
The story begins during sleep, so sleep-related experiences form one possible area for assessment. The available material does not establish such an explanation, but neither does it supply evidence that would distinguish dream, paralysis, memory construction and literal transport.
The figures' hair and fang-like teeth are retained because they are specific reported features. The Atlas does not amplify them into monsters or assume a biological species, and it does not supply clothing or technology beyond the sparse source.
CE4 reflects the alleged involuntary elevation and transport to an unfamiliar installation. It records the narrative claim rather than validating the base, craft or occupants.
The portrait reconstructs the alleged installation after the transition: the fully clothed adult witness walks beside one gray-haired guide, with a blonde woman and indistinct workers and craft in the background. It avoids the bedroom, levitation and any invented procedure. It is an illustrative reconstruction of a late anonymous account, not documentary evidence.