Omar Fowler’s taped interviews separate two series at High Hurlands Hospital, Passfield, in 1980. On July 18 around 8:30 p.m., six nurses heard humming and watched a flashing round light descend toward an orchard. One called it a ball; another relayed a saucerlike outline. No interviewed witness established a landing or definite departure, and attempted photographs reportedly showed nothing.
After midnight, Diane Edworthy and Helen Monger heard movement outside. While telephoning police around 12:35 a.m., they saw a massive black-clad figure at the French windows. Its large helmet concealed the face; padded, glistening clothing made it appear neckless. It stepped into darkness. Nurses at quarters beyond the orchard soon reported a similar prowler. Police and dogs found no footprints or scent. An ordinary intruder remained a possibility, especially given an earlier prowler report.
The October 9–10 episode instead involved two nurses observing a color-changing starlike light and a smaller lighted object near the orchard. They described unusual quiet, followed by animal agitation. A seriously ill boy in their care became distressed and later settled when the lights disappeared. Fowler recorded the claimed timing; it does not establish that the lights caused the child’s behavior.
His report first appeared in Pegasus and was reprinted in Flying Saucer Review 30/6. Hatch’s compressed July entry combines elements from both dates, including the boy and apparent probe. The plate labels a composite of the July light and later figure, omits patients and keeps the October observations separate in the narrative.
Recorded details
Local time
20:30
Craft description
Craft / Vehicle, Probe / Drone
Entity description
Unknown
Coordinate precision
SOURCE_APPROXIMATE
Date precision
EXACT_DAY
Case videos and witness interviews
Not of This World: Eight Truly Weird Extraterrestrial Encounters
The film separates July light/figure observations from October lights and child distress. A landing or definitive departure was not established by interviewed witnesses; photographs showed nothing. An ordinary intruder remained possible, and child behavior is not evidence that lights caused it.