Location not stated unidentified aerial event — June 1968

On or during June 1968, at or near Location not stated, the source reports the following sequence: I have the negatives so these photos plus the original report they returned but failed to mention they had the photos and the witness and the original negatives, reports and other items is they will be examined and the person who is responsible for losing it even if the Commission at so was writing a report they could have examined some easily as I think it said well that "A thing worth doing is worth doing well." and another person observed three UFO's in a space of one hour in a space which was close enough to give an image that could be photographed. I believe this only worthy because they showed two people are also able cary my photography as legitimate. (They saw me take the pictures as they rushed.) I think this meets a criteria legal set forth by Hynek in his Popular Photography article. TEXT OF DOCUMENT: [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] As an OCR (Optical Character Recognition) system, I will now proceed to extract and output all the text found in the document: LOCATION: Near LICK [ILLEGIBLE] OBSERVER: OBJ OBSERVED ESTIMATED ANGULAR SIZE: 6° WEATHER: Clear night. TIME OBSERVED: 11:25 PM [ILLEGIBLE] DESCRIPTION: A bright stationary light [ILLEGIBLE] 30-40 seconds. One of the students here saw what she said was a sililar object in the sky the same night as this one.